New Delhi : In a swift move to facilitate the uptake of Electric Vehicles in India, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, on 12th August, allowed the sale and registration of electric vehicles sans their most expensive component, i.e. the batteries.
“While this comes as a welcome move to reduce the high upfront costs of electric vehicles it would require better alignment with existing schemes, particularly FAME II, for effective implementation” says Udai S. Mehta, Deputy Executive Director of CUTS International.
Battery costs, though one-time investments, account for a 30-40% of the cost of an Electric Vehicle. Soaring battery prices are the reason for EVs not being able to compete with their ICE counterparts in the current market scenario.
To add to this, technology upgrades lead to exponential rises in the costs, with a lithium-ion battery costing almost double of a lead-acid battery. Thus, this move by the MoRTH to delink battery costs from vehicle costs has the potential to put E-2 wheelers and 3-Wheelers back into the competition as the upfront costs plummet.
Given the price sensitive nature of Indian consumers, cost parity will allow them to make an informed choice between ICEVs and EVs.
The move also has the potential to create an enabling environment for creation of a battery swapping network as batteries may now be sold separately by OEMs or energy service providers, subject to certification by authorised Test agencies.
In a post-Covid market scenario this seems to be a breath of fresh air for the EV dealers who seem to be gagging under the economic impact of the pandemic and prolonged lockdowns.
However, a crucial link which may be broken by this initiative is that between EVs and purchase incentives under the FAME II scheme of the Central Government. This is because the incentives under the scheme are based on the battery capacity of an EV. Thus, the implementation of this move will require restructuring of the benefits in order to achieve its intended objective.
Government should also work on schemes to increase skills, knowledge and production capacity that will avoid emergence of battery monopolies and quicker integration of EV’s into urban life.
Not clear to me what difference it makes to the total cost of the vehicle from the buyer’s point of view. For providing subsidies under FAME II, the govt may work out some modalities. But, for individual buyer this may make no difference.
we need to understand one time cost of battery and rest of mechanism andd body. if i understand fuel ccost of electric buses can offer a payoff of high battery cost. thus we compare life time cost of two alternative. and value the emission “cost”