By Bhupen Goswami (PNI)

Guwahati : Bharat Ratna to Bhupen Hazarika has been denounced by his son Tej Hazarika alleging that his father’s name has been politically used in the ongoing CAB controversy. An angry Tej Hazarika has issued a statement in this regard from the United States. Mr Hazarika was angry for using his father’s name in the ongoing Citizenship Amendment Bill controversy. While talking over phone from United State to the Pratidin Time, on being asked whether this denouncement amounted to refusal, Mr Tej Hazarika only cryptically said “wait for the statement and one step at a time”. A complete refusal by his son may not be feasible as the award is meant for Bhupen Hazarika and the family do not have right to refuse. Maximum he can refuse to accept the award on his behalf.Tez Hazarika said that Bharat Ratnas and longest bridges are necessary but they will not promote the peace and prosperity of the citizens of India.Tez Hazarika, son of late Assamese singer Bhupen Hazarika who was conferred Bharat Ratna posthumously, has refused to accept the honour to protest against the Citizenship Bill. Bhupen Hazarika’s brother Samar Hazarika has said that it was up to Tez to decide whether to accept the honour or not.

The… Read the full Facebook post of Tej Hazarika here:As the son of Dr. Bhupen Hazarika—one of the most popular and loved cultural and socio-political figures for the people of Assam and it’s neighboring sister states of India’s great Northeast—I believe that my father’s name and words are being invoked and celebrated publicly while plans are afoot to pass a painfully unpopular bill regarding citizenship that is actually undermining his documented position. It would in reality be in direct opposition to what Bupenda believed in his heart of hearts. For his fans—a vast majority of people of the Northeast—and India’s great diversity including all indigenous populations of India, he would never have endorsed what appears, quite transparently, to be an underhanded way of pushing a law against the will and benefit of the majority in a manner that also seems to be grossly un-constitutional, un-democratic and un-Indian. Adopting any form of this bill at this point in the manner in which it is being proffered, now or in the future, will ultimately have the sad and undesirable effect of not only disrupting the quality of life, language, identity and power balance of the region, but that of undermining my father’s position—by delivering a wreaking blow to the harmony, inner integrity and unity of the secular and democratic Republic of India. Bharat Ratnas and longest bridges while necessary, will not promote the peace and prosperity of the citizens of India. Only just popular laws and foresight on the part of leadership will. Numerous media journalists are now asking me whether or not I will accept the Bharat Ratna for my father. I go on record here to anwer that A), I have not received any invitation so far there is nothing to reject, and B), how the center moves on this matter far outweighs in importance the awarding and receiving of such national recognition—a display of short lived cheap thrills